TECHNOLOGY / ARCHITECTURE

Independent enforcement at the execution boundary.

The OSR target architecture separates execution policy, isolated workloads and trusted resource brokers from application and orchestration interfaces.

01

Reference architecture

  1. Applications, APIs, WordPress and autonomous agents submit authenticated execution requests.
  2. OSR independently validates principal identity, module digest, policy and exact capability scope.
  3. The proposed hardened host executes restricted WebAssembly workloads with enforceable CPU, memory and deadline limits.
  4. Filesystem, HTTP, database and external API access pass through trusted brokers with per-resource authorization.
  5. Audit evidence associates actor, policy, grant, request and outcome without exposing private data or secrets.
  6. QR-V may independently validate receipts; OMOS may orchestrate requests but neither can override OSR enforcement.
02

Proposed technology components

Rust + Wasmtime

Future hardened execution host using WebAssembly/WASI and restricted host interfaces. Not implemented in OSR 0.2.

Policy engine

Versioned default-deny grants, authenticated actors, expiration and revocation.

Capability brokers

Scoped file operations, destination-restricted HTTP, limited database operations and API access.

Durable evidence

Protected signing keys, signed receipts, persistent records and external integrity checkpoints.

Developer interfaces

Proposed React/TypeScript views for modules, policies, grants, approvals and evidence.

Connectors

Proposed WordPress, Node.js, OMOS/ACC and QR-V integration contracts.

03

Current implementation distinction

The supplied OSR 0.2 proof of concept uses Node.js/WebAssembly to demonstrate a narrow filesystem capability boundary. The Rust/Wasmtime runtime, hardened arbitrary-code isolation, authenticated distributed services, durable receipt storage and network/database brokers remain proposed until implemented and independently assessed.